As you can imagine, my story and family
photographs have created a great deal of controversy. In the spirit of
full disclosure I will reprint a message I posted summarizing my positions
on the James Family Forum (Genforum) in September of 2000. Again, my goal
has always been to determine the true identity of my great-grandfather and
to that end I welcome others' opinions and suggestions.
September 6, 2000 7:19 p.m.
There has been an ongoing dispute as to whether or not a photo of my
great-great-grandmother has been reversed. The photo in question is
pictured in my book and the caption reads: “In this Courtney family photo,
James Courtney’s mother is clearly missing her right arm. Close
examination of the photo reveals a large pin in the middle of the right
sleeve. When the author found this family photograph, she knew that her
great-great-grandmother and Zerelda James Samuel was the same person.” (I
believe that my opposition also knows the importance of this photo and
that is why it as been so vigorously attacked. After all, how many women
could have been running around Missouri looking just alike, wearing the
same dress, and missing the same arm?)
It was brought to my attention that one way to determine if a photo has
been reversed is to examine the buttons on the clothing of the individual
pictured in the photo in question. Traditionally, the buttons on a woman’s
garments are located on the left, whereas the buttons on a male’s garments
would be on the right.
I have examined the photo in question, and based on the information
presented above, the buttons are on the wrong side. I will concede that it
does appear that the photo in my book has been reversed at some point in
time. According to the location of the buttons, my great-great-grandmother
was missing her left hand instead of her right hand. Max Courtney was the
first to bring this matter to my attention, but Kathy Reynard and Linda
Snyder also deserve credit for their continued efforts in pointing out
this discrepancy. I sincerely thank each and every one of them for the
time and attention they devoted to this matter. If they had not been
persistent, I may not have ever discovered an error in the historically
accepted photos of Zerelda James Samuel.
Nearly every written account that I have read concerning the subject of
Zerelda’s missing arm, reports that it was her RIGHT arm that was
amputated due to it being severely shattered by a Pinkerton bomb. But as I
examined the questioned photo of my great-great-grandmother, I also
examined the buttons on known photos of Zerelda James Samuel. And that is
when I discovered that Zerelda’s right hand was not missing - it was her
left hand... just like my great-great-grandmother.
I kept remembering a conversation that I had with George Warfel and Betty
Barr in 1996 (Mr. Warfel is the photo authenticator for The James Farm &
Museum in Kearney, Missouri, and Betty Barr claims to be the
great-granddaughter of Jesse James). They were looking at a photo of my
great-great-grandmother, and I told them that not only did the women look
alike, they were wearing identical dresses and they were missing the same
hand. Mr. Warfel then asked which one of my great-great-grandmother’s
hands was missing. When I said that I thought it was her right hand, they
looked at each other and laughed as if it were a trick question. When they
walked away, I told my daughter that there was something about Zerelda’s
missing hand that they apparently did not want us to know.
I decided to call Mr. Warfel last week and ask him if he remembered the
aforementioned incident. He did. I then asked him which one of Zerelda’s
hands was missing. He said it was her right hand. At that point I asked
him if he had ever believed that Zerelda was missing her left hand instead
of her right hand. He said that he indeed had. I asked him what had made
him think that, and he said it was because photographs had indicated that
it was her left hand. (I now know it was the buttons on her clothing that
made him think it) In fact he had believed that Zerelda’s left hand was
missing from the time he started researching the James/Samuel family in
1936 or 1937, up until four or five years ago. Mr. Warfel is eighty-four
years old, and for over fifty years he had believed that Zerelda was
missing her left arm. Now it appears that he changed his mind about which
arm was missing at about the same time he saw the photo of my
great-great-grandmother. Hmmm. I of course asked him what had made him
change his mind about which arm was missing, and he said that he had read
some books that said it was her right arm (He hadn’t read any of those
books in fifty years?) I then asked him if it is true that one can tell if
a photo had been reversed by looking at the buttons. He replied that it
was definitely true. In fact, while we were speaking he was looking at the
photo of Zerelda on the cover of the book, MaMaw, by Susan Dodd. This
particular photo is also pictured in Phillip Steele’s book, Jesse and
Frank James: The Family History. Using the buttons as a guide while I was
examining both photos, I saw that it was Zerelda’s left hand that was
missing. Mr. Warfel still insists that Zerelda’s right arm was the missing
arm.
I can not say why most of the
written reports claim that it was her right hand, but either the buttons
on all of Zerelda’s garments that I have seen so far were on the wrong
side, or it was her left arm that was missing. The same would hold true in
my great-great-grandmother’s case.
I also can not understand how my
opposition could not have noticed that the buttons on Zerelda’s clothing
were also reversed. Or have they known all along? After all, they seem to
have all the answers. I am hopeful that the reader will see the
contradiction in Mr. Warfel’s remarks. He is always polite to me; he just
does what he can do to protect the historically accepted version of Jesse
James. This is just one example of the treatment that I (as well as others
who dare to dispute the historically accepted version of the fate of Jesse
James) have received in trying to determine the truth about my
great-great-grandfather. It gets really old. Like I have said before, if
they are all so sure I am wrong, why do they feel so threatened by my
claim?
I would like to take this opportunity to correct an error on Linda
Snyder’s web site. Linda has a photo of Dianah Andruss Courtney displayed
that she claims is a photo of my great-great-grandmother with two hands. I
am sure that Dianah Courtney did have two hands...but she was not my
great-great-grandmother. Zerelda James Samuel was my
great-great-grandmother. As far as I know, none of my relatives (the
descendants of the man known in Texas as James L. Courtney) have a copy of
that particular photo. The photo was obtained from the Haun family. I
think that none of us have that particular photo because it is not our
ancestor. Either that or my relatives did not share it with me. But it
will not surprise me a bit to hear the news in a few days that one of my
opposing relatives “just happened” to have a copy of it stashed away
somewhere. I am glad that Linda obtained a copy of the photo because I
have often wondered what Dianah Courtney looked like. Now I know.
A little bird has informed me that my opposition has had photo experts
examine the photos that I have presented as evidence supporting my claim
that my great-grandfather was really Jesse James. It has been reported
that they have said that the photo of my great-great-grandmother is in
poor condition. (I will have to agree with that finding, When my book was
published, the photo was enlarged so that the reader could easily see that
she was missing an arm. However, by enlarging the photo, it also distorted
the print of the material on her dress).
My opposition’s experts are also reported to have said that the faces in
question do not match, and that my great-great-grandmother definitely had
an arm. In an earlier posting on this forum, I said that this debate would
come down to their experts’ opinions against my four experts’ opinions,
sort of reminiscent of the O.J. Simpson trial. You know, the people with
the most money (O.J.) won the case. Therefore, I request that the reader
ask themselves four things before forming an opinion regarding my claim:
1. Examine the photos in my book.
2. Keep in mind that I did not pay one red cent to any of the four
experts’ that examined my photos. Also know that all four of them
concluded that the faces in question match, three of them giving written
statements verifying that fact.
3. Ask yourself why my opposition would harass the experts that examined
my photos to such an extent that they felt the need to disassociate
themselves with my claim. Does that sound like someone who is really
seeking the truth as they claim they are doing?
4. Ask any expert on Quantrill’s guerrillas or the James Gang, if these
men who were known for their hatred of the Union, would have tolerated a
Union soldier in their midst. If one considers five years of intense
research worth anything, I can answer that question - it wouldn’t have
happened.
Before I close, I want to address my opposition’s statement that recent
DNA tests provided “definitive proof ” that my great-grandfather wasn’t
Jesse James. I can assure the reader that their statement is wrong. They
have proved nothing, and I believe they know it. I have statements from
scientists that refute their findings. I have just learned not to reveal
too much information until the time is right. I don’t want these experts
harassed also. All of my new information will be released in the near
future.
Thanks for your interest.
As ever,
Betty Dorsett Duke